Hawk v. Barton
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. Matt. F. Johnson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Action on a contract. Defendant demurred to the complaint for insufficiency of facts, and also for the reason that the action is barred by section 336 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Defendant had judgment, from which plaintiff appeals. The complaint alleges that on May 12, 1890, one Matthew Lennox obtained a deficiency judgment for the sum of six hundred and twenty-eight dollars and sixty-six cents, arising out of a foreclosure suit, against one W. P. Harlow, and that the said judgment is unsatisfied, unpaid, and unreleased; that on May 16, 1893, defendant herein entered into a…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Mitchell v. Cal. & Or. Coast S.S. Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Toon v. Pickwick Stages, Northern Division, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1924
- Brasher v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- In Re Rand Mining Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1947
- Weck v. SucherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.