Legal Opinion
Szlosek v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 19, 1987No. Civ. A. 85-0318-FPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
FREEDMAN, Chief Judge.
Rose Szlosek and Kathleen Starkey, recipients of Social Security Title II benefits, challenge the validity of 20 C.F.R. § 416.1123(b) (1986), which deems money withheld to recoup overpayments under Title II of the Social Security Act (“Title II”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-433, as income for the purposes of calculating Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits under Title XVI of the Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381-1383c.
This action is before the Court on plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and class certification. Defendant counters with a cross motion for…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cervantez v. SullivanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1989
- Cervantez v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Rose Szlosek v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Martin v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Cervantez v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.