Legal Opinion

People v. Fonseca

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 7, 1995No. B086265PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Rejecting defendant's claims that a defense witness should have been compelled to testify, we affirm his cocaine trafficking conviction. We hold that a convicted defendant retains his Fifth Amendment privilege as to subsequent proceedings against other defendants at least until the time he no longer retains the right to file a timely notice of appeal.

BACKGROUND

An undercover officer approached Marcelo Ramirez and asked to buy cocaine. Ramirez told the officer to wait and walked several feet over to defendant, who gave Ramirez something from his pocket. Neither the officer nor his…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. People v. DeVaughnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. People v. SchellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. People v. WoodsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. DeLeon-Reyes v. GuevaraDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
  5. People v. Palmer CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API