Legal Opinion

Bohannan v. Innovak International, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided August 4, 2016No. CASE NO. 1:16-CV-272-WKWPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

W. Keith Watkins, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. # 8), which is construed as also containing a motion for a more definite statement (see Doc. # 8, at 10). The motions have been fully briefed (Docs. # 14 and 15). Upon careful consideration, both motions will be denied.

I.JURISDICTION AND VENUE

Subject-matter jurisdiction is exercised pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1832(d). Plaintiffs allege that they are all citizens of Alabama, that Defendant is a citizen of South Carolina, that they…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Gillespie v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fruitstone v. Spartan Race Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2021
  2. King v. UA Local 91District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2021
  3. King v. UA Local 91District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2020
  4. Resource Strategies, LLC v. Escambia Operating Co., LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2023
  5. Russell v. Tyson Farms, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API