Legal Opinion
Herman Corn v. City of Lauderdale Lakes
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided May 14, 1987No. 85-6024PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEHOE, District Judge:
Herman Com (“Com”) appeals from the dismissal of his action brought pursuant to Title 42, United States Code, Section 1983, on the grounds the District Court misapplied Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank, 473 U.S. 172, 105 S.Ct. 3108, 87 L.Ed.2d 126 (1985), to the facts of his case. A careful reading of the mandate of Williamson County in light of prevailing Florida law leads this Court to conclude that Corn’s action indeed was erroneously dismissed. Accordingly, we REVERSE and REMAND this case for further proceedings consistent with this…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Greenbriar, Ltd. v. City of AlabasterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Greenbriar, Ltd. v. City Of AlabasterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Herman Corn, Cross-Appellee v. City of Lauderdale Lakes, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- New Port Largo, Inc. v. Monroe CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Herman Corn, Trustee v. City of Lauderdale Lakes, a Florida Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.