Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of McKay

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 23, 1919No. Civ. No. 2956PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

The two appeals in this case are from decrees of partial distribution made upon the separate petitions therefor of the respondents herein, Horton L. McKay and Ethel M. Newman, formerly Ethel M. McKay. The testator, Angus McKay, made his last will and testament, which was duly admitted to probate, and thereafter, in the course of such probate proceedings, the petitions for partial distribution above referred to were filed. The will of Angus McKay is, in point of brevity, and, with the single exception in respect to which it is assailed herein, in point of clarity, a model. The devising portion…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rodisch v. MooreIllinois Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Estate of Heisserer v. LoosMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Chandler v. St. Mary's College of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Spriggs v. SpriggsMontana Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API