Legal Opinion

Driscoll v. Norwich Savings Society

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 16, 1952PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

This case involves the ownership of joint savings bank accounts. The finding is not attacked by the defendant Tarrant and is not subject to correction as urged by the plaintiff. It may be summarized as follows: Richard P. Haggerty and Mary Ellen O’Neill were married in Norwich in 1905. They lived together until their death in 1948, part of the time in Norwich and part of the time in New York. Mr. Haggerty was regularly employed until 1938. Mrs. Haggerty also worked.

As early as 1913, while still in Norwich, these people started to build up an estate through deposits in savings banks. After…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bachmann v. ReardonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  2. Brown v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
  3. Podzunas v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Grodzicki v. GrodzickiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  2. Loda v. H. K. Sargeant & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Salvio v. SalvioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. Fasano v. MelisoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  5. Flynn v. HinsleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API