Legal Opinion
Nelson v. Miller
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 25, 1999No. 97-1155PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
170 F.3d 641
9 A.D. Cases 234, 15 NDLR P 27
King NELSON; Karla Hudson; Charis Austin; Walter R.
Saumier; Charlotte Czarnecki; Kyle Austin,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Candice S. MILLER, in her official capacity as Secretary of
State for the State of Michigan, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 97-1155.
United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.
Argued March 11, 1998.
Decided March 25, 1999.
Diane C. Smith (argued and briefed), Amy E. Maes (argued and briefed), Michigan Protection & Advocacy Service, Lansing, Michigan, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Gary P. Gordon, Asst. Attorney Gen. (briefed), Office of the Attorney…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- William Robert Dare Gary Petillo v. State of California Dept. Of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Harris v. OwensCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Connelly v. Kansas Highway PatrolSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
- McGuire v. Ameritech Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
- Prager v. Kansas Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.