Legal Opinion

Mabbitt v. Wilkerson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 24, 1952No. 4-9720PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

Involved in this appeal is the question whether the provisions of a property settlement in a divorce decree are effective to eliminate the wife as the designated beneficiary in an insurance policy on the life of the husband.

Sometime prior to 1935, Harold W. Mabbitt and appellee were married and thereafter Mr. Mabbitt took out insurance policy No. 9,504,803 with the Equitable Life-Assurance Society of the United States. On July 8, 1943, they were divorced and the decree embodied the property settlement referred to above. The language therein, it is contended, barred appellee from anything, as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pedron v. OldsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  2. Sbisa v. LazarCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
  3. Eickelkamp v. CarlSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United Benefit Life Insurance v. PriceWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company v. BlightDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Allen v. FIRST NAT. BANK OF FORT SMITHSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  4. Aetna Life Insurance v. BushnellDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1960
  5. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. HughesDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API