Legal Opinion

Veriden v. McLeod

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1914No. Docket No. 105PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Wayne; Mandell, J. Case by Frank S. Veriden against Alexander I. McLeod and others for conspiracy to deprive plaintiff of a public office. Judgment for defendants, on a verdict directed by the court. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This case was commenced by declaration, the material parts of which are as follows:

“Frank J. Veriden, plaintiff in this suit, by James H. Pound, his attorney, comes into this court and complains of Alexander I. McLeod, Abner Larned, George Osius, Julius Hagar, William E. Roney, and Louis J. Girardin, defendants herein, in an action of trespass on the case, for that whereas, the defendants and this plaintiff are all residents of the village of Grosse Pointe Shores, * * * and are all citizens thereof, and the defendants are its village council, also were the inspectors of election at the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GrinsteadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
  2. Davis v. City of LebanonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
  3. Clinton v. EstesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1859
  4. Drake v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
  5. Hart v. HicksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fenestra Inc. v. Gulf American Land Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Peoples Savings Bank v. StoddardMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Roseville Plaza Ltd. Partnership v. United States Gypsum Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992
  4. Rencsok v. RencsokMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Studebaker Corporation v. Allied Products CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API