Legal Opinion
Baermann v. Ryan (In Re Ryan)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 14, 2009No. 19-05065PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN H. SQUIRES, Bankruptcy Judge.
These matters come before the Court on the cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to the Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7056, which incorporates by reference Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, filed by Maureen E. Ryan (the “Debt- or”) and Jon R. Baermann and Lisa M.D. Baermann (the “Plaintiffs”). For the reasons set forth herein, the Court denies the Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. The Court finds that the Plaintiffs have not demonstrated that the judgment entered by the Illinois state court should be afforded preclusive…
2Cases cited109 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Zamora v. Jacobs (In Re Jacobs)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
- Wachovia Securities, LLC v. Jahelka (In Re Jahelka)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
- Sullivan v. Glenn (In re Glenn)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Baermann v. Ryan (In Re Ryan)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
- Gasunas v. Yotis (In re Yotis)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.