Legal Opinion

Petersen v. Union Pacific Railroad

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided June 2, 2008No. 06-3084PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JEANNE E. SCOTT, District Judge:

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Union Pacific Railroad' Company’s (Union Pacific) Motion for Summary Judgment (d/e 283) (Motion). The Plaintiffs seek to recover for personal injuries and deaths that resulted from the collision (Collision) of an automobile and a Union Pacific freight train at the Cisco Steel Road grade crossing (Crossing) in Carlin-ville, Macoupin County, Illinois. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is allowed in part. Union Pacific has requested oral argument on the Motion. The request is denied because the Court…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API