Legal Opinion

Morey v. Standard Separator Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 9, 1916PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Polk District Court. — C. A. Dudley, Judge. Action at law to recover compensation for services alleged to have been rendered by plaintiff in the employment of defendant. Dismissed on defendant’s motion, because of insufficiency of the service of the original notice. The plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

1. Process: service on agent: nonresident corporation : original notice. The plaintiff alleges that, in September or October, 1911, he entered into an agreement with the defendant, a corporation organized in New Jersey and having its principal place of business in Wisconsin, to enter the employment of defendant for the sale of cream separators in Iowa and South Dakota, and, for such service, was to receive a specified commission upon his sales. He further alleges that, under such employment or agency, he proceeded to sell said separators, until the commission so earned by him aggregated $588,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Locke v. Chicago Chronicle Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  2. Murphy v. Albany Pecan Development Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  3. Pleak v. Marks & ShieldsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Davidson v. Henry L. Doherty & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  2. Tuttle v. Nichols Poultry & Egg Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  3. Walter M. Toole Co. v. Distributors Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  4. Wilson v. LindhartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  5. Hawbaker v. Laco Gas Burner Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API