Canal/Norcrest/Columbus Action Committee v. City of Boise
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WALTERS, Justice.
This appeal requires that we determine whether the City of Boise’s conditional use approval of a planned unit development in a mandatory design review zone is a final decision by the City that is ripe for review. We hold that it is, and we therefore reverse the district court’s dismissal of the petition for judicial review of the conditional use approval as premature.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The developer, Neighborhood Housing Services, Inc. (NHS) filed an application with the City seeking conditional use approval of a proposed mobile home park consisting of sixty-five…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Payette River Property Owners Ass'n v. Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Grever v. Idaho Telephone CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
- Ada County Assessor v. Roman Catholic Diocese of BoiseIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
- Rincover v. State, Department of FinanceIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Moon v. Investment BoardIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Neighbors for a Healthy Gold Fork v. Valley CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- Evans v. Teton CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
- Cantwell v. City of BoiseIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
- Cowan v. Board of Com'rs of Fremont CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
- Martin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.