Legal Opinion

Smith v. Hooper

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 1, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C. J.

Upon the exceptions to the denial of his motions for a nonsuit and a directed verdict the defendant admits his duty of care but denies any force of the evidence to show its breach. The breach alleged is his failure to use care in enforcing his rule that the liders should not carry whips.

A spectator at the show testified to seeing “some of the riders” in the ring with whips. The plaintiff and the boy who struck her horse each had one, according to her testimony. The defendant’s personal assignment was to “look out for the horses and the riders” and in the ring during the contest was his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. SoutherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  2. Smith v. Twin State Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
  3. Burke v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
  4. Morrison v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933
  5. Colby v. LeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nelson v. MorseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1940
  2. Stowe v. HartfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API