Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

White v. White

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 29, 1945No. Civ. 14949Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

THE COURT.

Without the slightest pretense of contrition or conciliation for her flouting the order of the court plaintiff, still ensconced in her Pennsylvania home with her child by her side, demands through her counsel a rehearing to the end that it might be adjudged by this court that she had been guilty of only a technical contempt of court and hence her deprivation of the monthly payments was unjust. The situation may have been better understood if we had set forth even more fully the history of appellant’s litigious efforts to effect her purposes.

Following the events narrated in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. SALVAGE PROCESS CORPORATION v. Acme Tank Cleaning Process CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  2. Olcott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Canavan v. CanavanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Republic Electric Co. v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929
  5. Fremont v. Merced Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1858

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API