Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Hygrade Water & Soda Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 1941PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHughes, P. J.

This is an appeal by defendant, Pepsi-Cola Company of St. Louis, from a judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis sustaining plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, following a jury verdict for the defendant. For the purposes of this appeal respondent concedes that the statement of appellant as .set forth in its brief is acceptable and may be adopted. Such statement is adopted and is as follows:

"This action was instituted in the Circuit Court of City’ of St. Louis, Missouri, on August 23, 1939, by plaintiff; thereafter plaintiff filed an amended petition and defendants filed their…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gardner v. TurkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  2. Orris v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1919
  3. Sakowski v. BairdSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  4. Barraclough v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  5. Nicholson v. FranciscusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gladden v. Missouri Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  2. Stubblefield v. Federal Reserve Bank of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  3. Ferrell v. Sikeston Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. Copher v. BarbeeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  5. Middleton v. Post Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API