Legal Opinion
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Premex, Inc., and Samuel Zack
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 28, 1981No. 80-2636PublishedCited by 101 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge.
Defendants Premex, Inc. (“Premex”) and Samuel Zack (“Zack”) appeal the district court’s holding that defendants individually violated the terms of a previously entered Consent Judgment of Permanent Injunction. The violation resulted in a civil contempt citation of the consent decree. In consequence, defendants were ordered to pay the expenses and fees incurred by plaintiff, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), in bringing defendants’ past violations of the decree to the court’s attention. At issue is whether Pre-mex and Zack were properly held…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- Morton M. Hill, Jr. v. Norfolk and Western Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Vertex Distributing, Inc. v. Falcon Foam Plastics, Inc., Falcon Manufacturing of California, Inc., James Allen, and Michael AllenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Stotler and Company, Cross-Appellee v. William J. Able, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Letsos v. Century 21-New West RealtyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
- United States v. Jose Vaz AyresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.