Legal Opinion

Layman v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided July 2, 1999No. 15189-97; No. 15190-97; No. 15191-97Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL F. LAYMAN, II, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Layman v. Commissioner

No. 15189-97; No. 15190-97; No. 15191-97

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1999-218; 1999 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 253; 78 T.C.M. (CCH) 11; T.C.M. (RIA) 99218;

July 2, 1999, Filed

Decisions will be entered under Rule 155.

James Benham, for petitioner.

Pamelya P. Herndon and Andrew J. Horning, for respondent.

Hamblen, Lapsley W., Jr.

HAMBLEN

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

HAMBLEN, JUDGE: Respondent determined deficiencies and additions to tax with regard to petitioner's 1991, 1992, and 1993 Federal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Shea v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1999
  3. Goodell v. KochSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Jurek v. JurekArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Guerrero v. GuerreroCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API