Legal Opinion
Hamilton v. Trivits
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided May 29, 1975PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON PETITION FOR COMPENSATION PAYMENTS DURING PENDENCY OF APPEAL
TAYLOR, Judge.
Plaintiff seeks mandamus against the Industrial Accident Board to compel the Board to make compensation payments to plaintiff out of the Industrial Accident Board Second Injury and Contingency Fund [Fund], The facts are not in dispute, and, therefore, the matter is being presented for decision on the legal issues.
Plaintiff suffered' a compensable industrial accident while working as an employee of Servomation, Inc., and a compensation agreement for payment of total disability was entered into between…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Johnson v. Chrysler CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
- General Motors Corporation v. FreemanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
- Air Mod Corporation v. NewtonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Foltz v. Pullman, IncorporatedSuperior Court of Delaware · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Clements v. Diamond State Port Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2003
- William H. Y. v. Myrna L. Y.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
- Blue Hen Lines, Inc. v. TurbittSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
- Friant v. FriantSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
- Department of Labor Ex Rel. Commons v. Green Giant Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.