Legal Opinion

In Re Vix

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 15, 2009No. 2008-B-2290PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

| ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

2Per curiam

This disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Raechelle M. Vix, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana.

UNDERLYING FACTS

Counts I & II — The Ashford Matter

In June 2003, Mirodello Ashford hired respondent to appeal his state criminal conviction. Respondent was paid a total of $4,300 in advanced fixed fees for the representation. 1 Thereafter, respondent failed to file a brief on behalf of Mr. Ashford or otherwise proceed with the appeal. She also failed to adequately…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. In Re CaulfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  4. In Re PardueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  5. In Re QuaidSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re: Mitchel M. Evans, IISupreme Court of Louisiana · 2016
  2. In re VixSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API