In Re Vix
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
| ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
2Per curiam
This disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Raechelle M. Vix, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana.
UNDERLYING FACTS
Counts I & II — The Ashford Matter
In June 2003, Mirodello Ashford hired respondent to appeal his state criminal conviction. Respondent was paid a total of $4,300 in advanced fixed fees for the representation. 1 Thereafter, respondent failed to file a brief on behalf of Mr. Ashford or otherwise proceed with the appeal. She also failed to adequately…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- In Re CaulfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
- In Re PardueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- In Re QuaidSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- In Re: Mitchel M. Evans, IISupreme Court of Louisiana · 2016
- In re VixSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2010