Legal Opinion

Teller v. Prospect Heights Hospital

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1938PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNova, J.

This is a motion to strike out two affirmative defenses in defendant’s answer numbered “ second ” and “ third,” respectively, pursuant to subdivision 6 of rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice, upon the ground that they are insufficient in law.

*908This action is one to recover for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff, a window cleaner, as a result of the defendant failing to provide safety devices required by section 202, as amended, of the Labor Law, and specified by the Rules of the Industrial Board pursuant to such statute. Section 202, as amended, reads as follows: “ Protection of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Karpeles v. . HeineNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Stern v. Great Island Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  4. Griebsch v. B. T. Babbitt, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Novitz v. MaineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commissioners of the State Insurance v. National City BankNew York Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API