Legal Opinion

Haff v. Adams

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1899No. Civil No. 666PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of tlie District Court of the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Maricopa. Webster Street, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtDoan, J.

This action was brought by the appellant, Mary R. Haft, in the district court, against the appellee, J. C. Adams, to recover the sum of $6,452 and interest thereon on account of certain jewelry and diamonds alleged to have been lost by the appellant while stopping at his hotel as a guest for hire, and while she was temporarily absent from her sleeping-room. The case was tried to a jury, and at the close of the evidence for the plaintiff the court, on motion of counsel for defendant, instructed the jury the bring in a verdict for the defendant; to which ruling the counsel for plaintiff…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Jones v. East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Roberts v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Magee v. Pacific Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Fisher v. KelseySupreme Court of the United States · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Arizona Binghampton Copper Co. v. DicksonArizona Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Haupt v. Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Insurance v. GarrisonArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Fisher v. Bonneville Hotel Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Garrett v. Reid-Cashion Land & Cattle CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API