Legal Opinion

Kenyatta Erkins v. State of Indiana

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 2014No. 58S01-1309-CR-586PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID, Justice.

Following his conviction for class A felony conspiracy to commit robbery resulting in serious bodily injury, Kenyatta Erkins presents us with a matter of first impression: whether the State must establish the existence of serious bodily injury for his conviction to stand. Without actual serious bodily injury to his alleged victim, he reasons, there is insufficient evidence to support his conviction. However, because conspiracy is a crime consisting of intent to commit an underlying crime, an agreement between or among conspirators to commit the underlying crime, and an overt…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Drane v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Fajardo v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. Moss-DwyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Survance v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Hendrix v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. William Clyde Gibson III v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Carltez Taylor v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Morgan Mannix v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Gary L. Mefford v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Anthony Wayne Barnett v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API