Legal Opinion

Anthony Wayne Barnett v. State of Indiana

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 25, 2017No. Court of Appeals Case 22A01-1510-CR-1742PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kirsch, Judge.

This case returns to our court following the grant of a conditional writ of habe-as corpus by the United States'District Court for the Northern District of Indiana (“the District Court”), which held 'that Anthony Wayne Barnett (“Barnett”) was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel on direct appeal when counsel did not raise an appellate challenge to the timeliness of the State’s second amendment to Barnett’s charging information. The District Court, following the reasoning of the Seventh Circuit in Shaw v. Wilson, 721 F.3d 908, 912 (7th Cir. 2013), reh’g denied,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Peyton v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Fajardo v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. William E. Mays v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Levern Nicole Howard v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Anthony Barnett v. WardenDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2025
  4. Barnett v. WardenDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2020
  5. Santori R. Dorsey v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API