Legal Opinion

Holland v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 12, 1993No. CR 91-194PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

William Warren Holland, the appellant, was convicted of two charges of robbery in the first degree. He was sentenced as a habitual offender to imprisonment for life without parole in each case. Through appointed counsel, the appellant raises four issues on this appeal from those convictions.

I

The appellant argues that he was denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial. The significant facts are set forth in chronological order as follows:

September 9, 1987, and December 31, 1987: Two separate robberies were committed in Montgomery, Alabama: Adams Pharmacy on Mitchell Drive was robbed on…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabama v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. Debra A. E.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Hutcherson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  3. Moody v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  4. Hunt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  5. Apicella v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API