Holland v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
William Warren Holland, the appellant, was convicted of two charges of robbery in the first degree. He was sentenced as a habitual offender to imprisonment for life without parole in each case. Through appointed counsel, the appellant raises four issues on this appeal from those convictions.
I
The appellant argues that he was denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial. The significant facts are set forth in chronological order as follows:
September 9, 1987, and December 31, 1987: Two separate robberies were committed in Montgomery, Alabama: Adams Pharmacy on Mitchell Drive was robbed on…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabama v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. Debra A. E.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
- Hutcherson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
- Moody v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
- Hunt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
- Apicella v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.