Local 1605 Amalgamated Transit Union v. Central Contra Costa County Transit Authority
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFFS’ FLSA CLAIM AND GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON MMBA CLAIM
WILKEN, District Judge.
Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1605 and five members of the Union’s negotiat ing committee (collectively, Plaintiffs) seek compensation for time spent bargaining with Defendant Contra Costa County Transit Authority (CCCTA) during a lawful strike in January, 1998. Plaintiffs move for summary judgment on their claims that their time spent in negotiations was compensable under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kayser v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2012
- Jericho Nicolas v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021