Legal Opinion · Dissent

Moore v. Kansas Turnpike Authority

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 25, 1957No. 40,335Published

1DissentSchroeder, J.

In my opinion, the decision in Moore v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 181 Kan. 51, 310 P. 2d 199, was the correct decision on the facts and circumstances presented as to the point of law here involved.

This court on its own motion, May 15, 1957, granted a rehearing in the above entitled case, . . limited to the question of consolidation of appeals from the award of the appraisers.” Attorneys of record in Jenkins v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, No. 40,587 (decided this date), were granted leave to file briefs amicus curiae, which they did.

An effort will be made in this dissent to emphasize the…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Walker v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Boston Chamber of Commerce v. City of BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 695 v. Vogt, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. A. W. Duckett & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API