People v. Wiggins
Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors
1Dissent
DiFIORE, Chief Judge (dissenting).
It is undisputed that the five-year postindictment delay in prosecuting defendant, who was incarcerated the entire time, was extraordinary, triggering the "sensitive weighing process of the diversified factors present in the particular case," as set forth in People v. Taranovich, 37 N.Y.2d 442, 445, 373 N.Y.S.2d 79, 335 N.E.2d 303 (1975). There is also no question that the lengthy pretrial incarceration of a defendant who was 16 years old at the time of arrest is presumptively prejudicial. However, it remains incumbent upon us, in determining whether…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- People v. TaranovichNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. McRayNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.