Legal Opinion
Guidant Corp. v. St. Jude Medical, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided January 6, 2006No. Civ. 04-0067-SLRPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROBINSON, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On February 2, 2004, Guidant Corporation and its subsidiaries Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. and Guidant Sales Corporation, along with co-plaintiff Mirowski Family Ventures, L.L.C. (collectively called “plaintiffs”), filed the present action against St. Jude Medical, Inc. and Pacesetter, Inc. (collectively called “defendants”), alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. Re 38,-119E (the “ ’119 reissue patent”). (D.I.l)
On April 19, 2005, the court granted St. Jude’s motion for leave to file an early summary judgment motion on recapture. Before the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal Ig CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- The Read Corporation and F.T. Read & Sons, Inc. v. Portec, Inc., D/B/A Portec/kolberg DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.