Legal Opinion
McGrath v. Valentine
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 8, 1909No. 1,610PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
We find no error in the ruling of the court that the affirmative matter pleaded in the answer constituted no defense to the action as to the tracts in lots 1 and 3, particularly described in the complaint. In Miller v. Margene, 149 F. 694, 79 C.C.A. 382, in a similar case, this court held that, under the law and the regulations of the Secretary of the Interior, persons claiming the right to obtain legal title to lots in the town of Juneau were required to make application therefor to the trustee of the town site, that the trustee was clothed with authority…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lynd v. PicketSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1862
- Patterson & Frisbie v. ElyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Tyee Consolidated Mining Co. v. LangstedtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
- German-American Bank v. WhiteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Moulton v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Valentine v. McGrathDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1910
- United States v. CadzowDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1914
- Valentine v. HynesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
- Hansen v. JeffersonDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1945
- United States v. BergerDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1945