Legal Opinion
Richmond Hosiery Mills v. Camp
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 14, 1934No. 7451PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRYAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal by the Richmond Hosiery Mills from a decree dismissing its bill to enjoin the United States district attorney from prosecuting it for violating a provision of a code of fair competition adopted for the hosiery industry, and approved by the President, pursuant to section 3(a) of the National Industrial Recovery Act. 48 Stat. 195, 196 (15 USCA § 703(a).
Section 3(f) of the act (15 USCA § 703 (f) provides that any violation of such a code shall be a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of not more than $500 for each offense, each day the violation continues…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Terrace v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- In Re SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Boise Artesian Hot & Cold Water Co. v. Boise CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Cavanaugh v. LooneySupreme Court of the United States · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bradley Lumber Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
- Redlands Foothill Groves v. JacobsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1940
- Heller Bros. Co. v. LindCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
- United Insurance of Chicago v. MaloneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Associated Press v. HerrickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.