Legal Opinion
County of Contra Costa v. East Bay Municipal Utility District
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 10, 1964No. Civ. 21331PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, J.
Defendants, East Bay Municipal Utility District and Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District, bodies corporate and politic of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as “Utility District” and “Transit District,” 1 respectively, appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, The County of Contra Costa, hereinafter referred to as “the County,” for a share of election expenses charged to such districts as a result of the consolidation of certain elections called by them.
Questions Presented
1. Is Utility District legally obligated to pay the County a share of the costs of the June 3, 1958…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- County of Los Angeles v. FrisbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Hough v. McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- County of Placer v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
- City & County of San Francisco v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. DerbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- County of Fresno v. Clovis Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Wilson v. San Francisco Municipal RailwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- County of San Mateo v. Belmont County Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- California Attorney General Opinion 24-502, California Attorney General Reports2025
- People v. SinclairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.