Legal Opinion

Santibanez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 14, 1986No. 944-82PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

TEAGUE, Judge.

The record before us reflects that Jessie Flores Santibanez, appellant, was tried on an indictment that alleged the offense of murder, but was convicted by a jury for committing the lesser included offense of voluntary manslaughter, after which the jury assessed punishment at ten years’ confinement in the Department of Corrections.

The Eastland Court of Appeals, after overruling appellant’s sole ground of error, that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss his indictment because the State had failed to comply…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Barfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Ordunez v. BeanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Durrough v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. People v. GanciNew York Court of Appeals · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. May v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  2. Ex Parte Joshua Dewayne Ragston, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
  3. Mullen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. State v. McCahillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  5. Toney v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API