Legal Opinion
State v. McCahill
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 19, 2003No. SC 16817PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly denied the motion to dismiss the information filed by the defendant, James A. McCahill, *439after he was not brought to trial within thirty days after he filed a motion for a speedy trial pursuant to General Statutes § 54-82m1 and Practice Book § 43-41.2 The defendant appeals3 from the judgment of conviction of burglary in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-101 (a) (2)4 and sexual assault in the first *440degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70 (a) (l).5 The defendant contends that the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. BubarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- State v. OrtizSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Morton Buildings, Inc. v. BannonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Connor v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. BonnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. TutsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. WinerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. RosadoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.