Legal Opinion
Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1588 v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 15, 1993No. 11913PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.
The plaintiff, Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1588,1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court confirming an arbitration award and finding that the defendant, Laidlaw Transit, Inc., had complied with the award. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly found that the defendant had complied with the award. In its reply brief and again at oral argument, the plaintiff conceded that during the pendency of this appeal union member June Collins had been reinstated to the position to which she claimed she was entitled as a result of the arbitration award. We hold that the trial court…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Reynolds v. VroomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Shays v. Local Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Von Langendorff v. RiordanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Sobocinski v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Vail v. American Way Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hilton v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Ko Shu Mei Wu v. Chung-Ming ChangSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Shore v. Haverson Architecture & Design, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. KlingerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. HairstonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.