Legal Opinion

Meyn v. Schutte

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1959PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarcus G. Christ, J.

These are three motions for summary judgment. The plaintiff Meyn moves for judgment in his action based on a series of promissory notes, of which 42 at $100 each *472still remain unpaid. The defendant Schutte moves for judgment on a claim over against the third-party defendants Anderson and Koster on a contract of indemnity, and Anderson moves for summary judgment on a counterclaim which he has asserted against Meyn.

The notes were originally given by Schutte to Meyn when he purchased a grocery store from him in 1953. The notes were secured by a chattel mortgage which provided among other things,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Calvo v. . DaviesNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Morgan v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. National Mechanics' Banking Ass'n v. ConklingNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  4. National Citizens' Bank v. . ToplitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  5. Brill v. BrandtNew York Supreme Court · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dawson v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of MarylandDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1961
  2. EQUITABLE SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. United Natural Foods, Inc. v. BurgessDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  4. Hendershot v. Charleston National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Keybro Enterprises v. Four Seasons Country Club Caterers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API