John V. Farwell Co. v. Hilbert
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Dodge county: A. Soott Sloan, Circuit Judge. This action was brought to set aside two judgment notes, and judgments entered thereon, and levies of execution made to satisfy the same, namely, a judgment note in favor of Buey Ellen Hilbert, against the defendants G. B. Hilbert and H. M. Johnson, for $5,423.19, dated August 27, 1892, upon which judgment was entered in her favor against them in the circuit court for Dodge county,…
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Dodge county: A. Soott Sloan, Circuit Judge. This action was brought to set aside two judgment notes, and judgments entered thereon, and levies of execution made to satisfy the same, namely, a judgment note in favor of Buey Ellen Hilbert, against the defendants G. B. Hilbert and H. M. Johnson, for $5,423.19, dated August 27, 1892, upon which judgment was entered in her favor against them in the circuit court for Dodge county, December 30, 1893, for $5,421.51; and a judgment note in favor of the defendant James J. Hilbert against the defendant G.…
1Opinion of the CourtPinney, J.
We think that the findings of the circuit court against the substantive allegations of the plaintiff’s complaint, except one, and that the judgments attacked by the plaintiff were founded upon bona fide debts of the defendants G. B. Hilbert and H. M. Johnson, and of G. B. Hilbert, were warranted by the evidence. Certainly, there was no preponderance of evidence against its conclusions. The findings of fact must, therefore, be accepted as verities, and it would serve no useful purpose to set forth the substance of the evidence, or enter upon any discussion of it.
*441The only question that remains…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Knox County v. HarshmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Walker v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
- Stokes v. KnarrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
- Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Milwaukee Worsted MillsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- F. Mayer Boot & Shoe Co. v. FalkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cantwell v. CantwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
- Hockaday v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
- Meyer v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Vinquist v. SiegertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- Mitchell v. City of ThomasvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.