Legal Opinion

Howland v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 26, 1932No. Docket No. 8507PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON (IRA F.), J.

The city of Long Beach instituted an action in eminent domain against the petitioners here February 3', 1926, and on that date the respondent court made its order fixing the amount of money to be deposited by the plaintiff as a condition of being admitted to immediate possession of the premises involved and also made its order letting plaintiff into possession upon making the required deposit. In due course petitioners filed their answer, but the action was not tried until November, 1931. Several motions were made by the defendants in the trial court between February,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vallejo & Northern Railroad v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  2. McKannay v. McKannayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Sanborn v. BeldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Vilhac v. Stockton & Ione R.R.California Supreme Court · 1878
  5. San Mateo Waterworks v. SharpsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Carl R. Gray, Jr., Administrator of Veterans' Affairs v. Dukedom BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
  2. Andrews v. Police Court of StocktonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Arechiga v. Housing Authority of City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. In re the City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Kahn v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API