Gibbons v. Brandt
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MAJOR, Chief Judge.
In an action predicated on the Illinois Liquor Control Act, Ill.Rev.Stat.1945, Chap. 43, Sec. 135, Mary Gibbons obtained a judgment against Jack Cannaven, who operated a tavern in a building located in Chicago which was owned by Hugo E. and Ruth E. Brandt. Subsequently, an equitable action was brought, also under the Illinois Liquor Control Act, to enforce the judgment thus obtained against certain real estate owned by Hugo E. and Ruth E. Brandt, to which action these parties were named as defendants. From a decree in favor -of the plaintiff the defendants appealed. This…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re PottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Gibbons v. BrandtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
- Mays v. BurgessCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
- Swalley v. Addressograph-Multigraph Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
- Cheston v. IgoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pollei v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1990
- Independent Nail & Packing Co., Inc. v. Perry, JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
- King v. Alaska State Housing AuthorityAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Pennsylvania Chiropractic Ass'n v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- United States v. WintnerDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.