Legal Opinion

Bray v. Cadle Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 23, 1994No. B14-93-00287-CVPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEARS, Justice.

Roy H. Bray appeals from an adverse judgment in appellee’s suit for deficiency on a promissory note. Bray raises nineteen points of error. We affirm.

Bray executed a promissory note payable to Security Bank in the amount of $60,000.00. It was a 12-month note with interest only payable quarterly. The note recited on its face that it was secured by a Transfer of Note and Liens, covering a promissory note in the amount of $90,000.00, executed by Samuel and Barbara Hagopian and payable to Bray. Prior to the maturity date of his note, Bray made three quarterly interest…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bender v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Strickland v. Coleman, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
  3. International Bank NA v. MoralesTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Arguelles v. Kaplan, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987
  5. In Re Investors & Lenders, Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bank One, Texas, N.A. v. Stewart, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  2. Oyster Creek Financial Corp. v. Richwood Investments II, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2004
  3. Starcrest Trust v. Berry, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996
  4. Anglo-Dutch Petroleum International, Inc., and Anglo-Dutch (Tenge), LLC v. Greenberg Peden, P.C., and Gerald J. SwonkeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  5. WEISFIELD v. Texas Land Finance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API