Legal Opinion

United States v. Perelman

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 26, 2011No. 10-10571PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRABER, Circuit Judge:

Defendant David M. Perelman fraudulently obtained a Purple Heart and wore it in public. The government indicted him for violating 18 U.S.C. § 704(a), which prohibits (among other things) the unauthorized wearing of military medals. Defendant pleaded guilty but reserved his right to appeal the district court’s rejection of his First Amendment facial challenge to the statute. Reviewing de novo the constitutionality of the statute, United States v. Vongxay, 594 F.3d 1111, 1114 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 131 S.Ct. 294, 178 L.Ed.2d 193 (2010), we affirm.

Defenda…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. United States v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. PerelmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. People v. GuiamelonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. United States v. StrandlofCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API