Legal Opinion

Cockrell v. Dobbs

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 14, 1964No. 5-3418PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Bose Smith, J.

This is a petition by Bruce Cockrell for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent, as the presiding judge of the Garland circuit court, to grant a hearing upon Cockrell’s motion for a change of venue. The petitioner, charged with murder, asked for a change of venue, asserting that he could not obtain a fair trial in Garland county. In refusing to conduct a hearing upon the motion Judge Dobbs explained that he had concluded that he could not grant any relief even if the motion had merit.

This was Judge Dobbs’s reasoning: The Bill of Bights provides that the venue may be changed to another…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Turner v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  2. State v. FlynnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1876
  3. State v. HarveySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Perry v. LockhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  2. Perry v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  3. Harnack v. District Court of Woodbury CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  4. Thomas Simmons v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, and Steve Clark, Attorney General, State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  5. Doyle v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API