Legal Opinion

In re the Personal Restraint of McCready

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 11, 2000No. 17989-3-IIIPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKurtz, C. J.

— Patrick Vernon McCready seeks relief from personal restraint imposed following his jury conviction for first degree assault. The jury found that he was armed with a firearm at the time he committed the offense. In this timely filed petition, Mr. McCready contends he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Specifically, the State had offered Mr. McCready a plea bargain, under which it agreed to reduce the charge to second degree assault if he pleaded guilty. He asserts that he rejected the State’s offer without his counsel informing him that the mandatory five-year firearm enhancement…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Glimmert Beckham v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. State v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  3. People v. BlommaertAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. State v. HolmCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  5. State v. KlingerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In re the Personal Restraint of MonschkeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  2. In Re McCreadyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of CraceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  4. State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API