In re the Personal Restraint of Monschke
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 In this personal restraint petition (PRP), Kurtis William Monschke asks us to order a new trial or a reference hearing regarding his conviction for aggravated first degree murder. He argues that (1) his trial counsel were ineffective when they did not do a proper investigation or pretrial preparation of his defense expert witness who, in testifying, undermined key elements of Monschke’s defense and (2) it was prosecutorial misconduct for the State to reach a plea agreement with Monschke’s codefendant Tristain Frye based on a personal friendship between the elected prosecutor and Frye’s…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. CamarilloWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1987
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- In re the Personal Restraint of CrowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- In re the Personal Restraint of GriffinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Fernandez v. BennettDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
- Hawkins v. AndrewjeskiDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2023
- In Re The Personal Restraint Petition Of Aaron W. TrotterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.