Legal Opinion

Walker v. Mauro

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1853PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to St. Louis Law Commissioner’s Court. 1. Neither an agreement to pay rent, nor an express contract with the tenant, nor reservation of rent need be alleged or proved; an understanding will be implied, and an agreement to pay what the premises are fairly worth understood, wherever a permissive holding is established. Taylor on Landlord and Tenant, 294, 295. O’Fallon, adm’r, v. Eoismenue, § Mo.

Read the full summary

Error to St. Louis Law Commissioner’s Court. 1. Neither an agreement to pay rent, nor an express contract with the tenant, nor reservation of rent need be alleged or proved; an understanding will be implied, and an agreement to pay what the premises are fairly worth understood, wherever a permissive holding is established. Taylor on Landlord and Tenant, 294, 295. O’Fallon, adm’r, v. Eoismenue, § Mo. Rep. 286. 2. In cases where an order is drawn for the whole of a particular fund, it amounts to an equitable assignment of that fund, and after-notice to the drawee, it binds the fund in his…

1Opinion of the Court

Gamble, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court.

Tbe petition in tbis case states tbe fact that Scoffeld & Ferris were indebted to tbe plaintiff, and with sufficient distinctness alleges that Mauro, by being tbe tenant of S. & F. became indebted to them in tbe sum of $150 for rent. It next states, that S. & F. assigned to plaintiff tbe debt of tbe defendant on account of tbe rent due to them, and that such assignment is evidenced by an order drawn by S. & F. on tbe defendant for tbe whole amount due, which order tbe defendant refused to pay. The petition was demurred to and tbe demurrer…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mandeville v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  2. Dobyns v. McGovernSupreme Court of Missouri · 1852

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Wellsburg v. KimberlandsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Board of Commissioners v. JamesonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Varley v. SimsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  4. Bank of Commerce v. BogySupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  5. First National Bank v. Dubuque Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1879

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API