Legal Opinion

T.F.T.F. Capital Corp. v. Marcus Dairy, Inc.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided November 6, 1998No. 5:91CV483 WWEPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

EGINTON, Senior District Judge.

Pending before the court are defendants Marcus Dairy, Inc. and Michael Marcus’ (“defendants Marcus”) motion for summary judgment. Based on the following discussion, defendants’ motion will be granted.

I. Background

Pursuant to the parties’ Local Rule 9 submissions, the facts relevant to this discussion are as follows. Naugatuck Dairy Ice Cream Company, Inc. (“Naugatuck”) was a Connecticut corporation whose majority shareholders were Marcus Diary, Inc. (“Marcus Dairy”) and Dominick Barbiero. The business of Naugatuck was the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. T.F.T.F. Capital Corp. v. Marcus Dairy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  2. Capital Corp. v. Marcus Dairy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  3. Jackson Hill Road Sharon CT, LLC v. Town of SharonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API