Legal Opinion

State v. Cash

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided July 30, 1992No. 1839PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Goolsby, Judge:

Morris Winfred Cash represented himself during a trial for first-degree criminal sexual conduct, a trial that resulted in his conviction for third-degree criminal sexual conduct. Cash appealed and the Supreme Court remanded the case for the trial court to determine whether Cash knowingly and intelli*42gently waived his right to counsel. State v. Cash, 304 S.C. 223, 403 S.E. (2d) 632 (1991). On remand, the trial court determined Cash knowingly and intelligently waived the right. Cash appeals. We affirm.

At a pre-trial hearing, Cash asserted his right of self-representation. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Prince v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  3. Wroten v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  4. State v. CashSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  5. Bridwell v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BoykinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  2. State v. McLaurenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Gardner v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  4. State v. CampenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  5. Hines v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API