Legal Opinion
Fernando Armendariz, et al. v. Sig Sauer, Inc.
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided June 27, 2023No. 22-cv-00536-JLPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Fernando Armendariz, et al. v. Civil No. 1:22-cv-00536-JL Opinion No.
2023 DNH 078
Sig Sauer, Inc. MEMORANDUM ORDER In this consolidated product liability action, the defendant Sig Sauer, Inc. moves to sever and transfer the plaintiffs’ claims to their home districts, arguing that the claims are misjoined and improperly brought in this court. It also moves to dismiss the plaintiffs’ New Hampshire Consumer Protection Act counts for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The plaintiffs are 20 owners or users of Sig Sauer’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Francisco Pujol v. Shearson/american Express, Inc., Appeal of Ana Bonelli De PujolCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Martino v. Forward Air, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Pacamor Bearings, Inc. v. Minebea Co., Ltd.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996
- Uncle Henry's Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Plaut Consulting Co., Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant, Edgewing, a Division of Plaut Consulting Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Armendariz v. Sig Sauer, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2023