Legal Opinion

Wardlow v. Andrews

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 1, 1915No. 5547PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Hidalgo County Court; W. H. Gossage, Judge. Action by Frank Andrews and others, receivers, against W. D. Wardlow. From judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCarl, J.

The St. Louis, Brownsville & Mexico Railway Company, through its receiver, Frank Andrews, the St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Company, through its receivers, Thos. H. West, W. C. Nixon, and W. P. Riddle,- and the Houston & Texas Central Railway Company, appellees, sued appellant, W. D. Wardlow, and recovered a judgment for the difference between the rate quoted to and paid by appellant on a shipment of lumber from Woodville, Okl., to Llano Grande, Tex., and the rate alleged to have been promulgated by the Interstate Commerce Commission which was claimed to be in force at that time.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MuggSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. HefleySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. C. H. Albers Commission Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Cisco Oil MillSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Illinois Central Railroad v. Henderson Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Largent v. EtheridgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  2. Rone v. MartiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. City of Ft. Worth v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Herrin Transp. Co. v. MarmionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. City of Greenville v. McAfeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API